
7:30p PT
Fox Sports Prime Ticket
KSPN 710 AM
Posting an 87.7 offensive efficiency number against the league’s most porous defense requires a special level of bad execution and indifference. The best illustration of this comes at the conclusion of the first quarter, when the Clippers watch a one-point lead evaporate, leaving them with a nine-point deficit at the quarter break. They fail to score on 10 straight possessions. Sacramento establishes a double-digit lead fewer than three minutes into the second quarter and never relinquishes it. The loss is particularly dispiriting because the Clippers, by their standards, have been playing fairly well since Zach Randolph rejoined the team after serving a two-game suspension. The victories against Golden State and Boston weren’t complete efforts, but the Clippers got the job done against a team that plays a style of ball that tests the Clippers’ strengths, and one that plays a style that’s generally fluent to the point of flawlessness.
Were the Clippers simply missing high-percentage shots? How lazy was their execution? The Clippers’ lineup is Baron-Jones-Collins-Randolph-Camby. Let’s take a look:
No disrespect for Jones, but that option for Camby would be a lot more attractive if it’s Eric Gordon, who could take Martin off the dribble with an assertive left-handed drive. One of the striking things about this game is how little of the Clippers offense is precipitated by penetration. Eric Gordon is the catalyst for that, and much of the rigor mortis we saw at the end of the Boston game and in Sacramento is a byproduct of his absence.
Fortunately, the offensive rebound comes out to the Clippers and they reset. The ball goes into Randolph, against Hawes this time. Zach passes out to Ricky Davis behind the arc, and Davis misses another uncontested 3PA that grazes the front of the rim.
Regarding Ricky. What are the Clippers accomplishing here? He’s posted a 44.5% TS, 31.2% from beyond the arc, a PER of 7.10, a two-year adjusted plus/minus of -4.72, and an embarrassing offensive efficiency rating of 92. In what universe does this help your ball club? The problem is that he’s got a 2-year, so I’m afraid the Clippers are stuck with him.
Sacramento doesn’t play bad defense, but the Clippers have the wrong guys taking the wrong shots. Along with the hellacious turnovers and failure to convert the easy looks, this absolves the Kings of having to do much of anything. We also see that with bad shots comes easy transition opportunities for the other side, so what could’ve been a 4-0 run for the 26th most offensively efficient team in the league compounds into a 10-0 spurt.
According to Chris Tomasson of the Rocky Mountain News [which published its last edition today], Hart will become a member of the Denver Nuggets next week. Chris posted this at TrueHoop Network affiliate, Roundball Mining Company:
The Nuggets next week will sign point guard Jason Hart, multiple sources told the Rocky Mountain News on Friday.
Hart has been bought by the Los Angeles Clippers for about $300,000. After he clears waivers, expected to be on Tuesday, he will sign a prorated minimum deal with the Nuggets.
Hart, making $2.5 million before his buyout, will give the Nuggets the third point guard they are seeking. Hart had to be waived by Sunday’s deadline to be eligible for the playoffs with the Nuggets. Hart has played sparingly with the Clippers this season, averaging 2.3 points in 28 games. He played for Nuggets coach George Karl as a Milwaukee rookie in 2000-01.
The Nuggets had been looking Mateen Cleaves of the NBA Development League’s Bakersfield Jam as a possible roster addition. But then the Hart situation materialized.
The Nuggets are seeking a third point guard to take some of the burden off Chauncey Billups, 32, and Anthony Carter, 33.
Best of luck to Chris, who is one of the best and most industrious beat writers around. Denver sports fans are a little poorer today with the shuttering of the RMN.
Mike Taylor channeling Jason Richardson during warmups [Hat Tip: Joel]:
In many respects, today is a lousy moment to discuss what Al Thornton means to the Los Angeles Clippers in the long term. For one, making wholesale evaluations of a team or a player following a game like last night’s win over Boston is always dangerous due to the lightning-in-a-bottle quality of the victory. Would the Clippers have won last night’s game had Thornton played 38 minutes, and Mardy Collins been used in a limited role? Unlikely, but as sample sizes go, one game against a unique opponent is an unfair measure of a single player’s value. Collins is the only guy on the active roster with the defensive skills to render Paul Pierce ineffective, and the results of a Thornton-Pierce matchup would’ve likely produced far less favorable results for the Clippers.
Second, Eric Gordon’s uncertain status presents another challenge, because it’s impossible to look at a team’s small forward in an isolated context without also considering his counterpart at the 2. What Thornton can or can’t do to help the ball club is an entirely different conversation if that team has Eric Gordon at shooting guard versus, say, Fred Jones, Cuttino Mobley, or Kobe Bryant for that matter. Wing players on a good team will always share a symbiosis beyond sheer chemistry. Trying to glean something meaningful about Thornton’s absence is virtually impossible while Gordon is also out of action.
Those disclaimers aside, Mardy Collins’ performance last night provides, if not a proper parallel, then at least an interesting prism through which to view the Clippers’ wing personnel. Collins and Thornton possess some of the same properties. Both are historically inefficient offensive players, and they share a virtually identical, poor true shooting percentage as a Clipper this season [49.2 TS% for Collins/49.3 TS% for Thornton]. Apart from that, they’re quite different. Al is your prototypical small forward who relies on his very singular athleticism to create his own shot. Collins, meanwhile, lacks quickness and athleticism and must use his versatility as a role player with a passable handle, decent ability to move the basketball, and a capacity to defend multiple positions.
The Celtics were the perfect opponent for Collins to showcase his limited talents. Boston runs multiple pick-and-rolls on both sides of the floor, always looking for the defensive switch they can exploit in an instant. Collins is a flexible defender who knows what he’s doing on the S/R, and doesn’t cost you a lot on a switch, whether he ends up on the ball, the roll, a PG, and even some bigs. When Boston goes to an isolation set, Pierce is their guy — particularly when Garnett is out of the lineup. Collins proved last night that he’s a capable man-to-man defender, something Thornton struggles with on a nightly basis.
Enter Eric Gordon. Asked recently if he could think of anything wrong with his rookie phenom, Clippers head coach Mike Dunleavy shrugged.
“He’s not 6′ 5″?”
Here’s what we can infer from Dunleavy’s point: Gordon has demonstrated some serious defensive chops against many opposing shooting guards, but as capable as Eric is in that regard, he doesn’t afford his coach the luxury of assigning him to the opponent’s small forward. For a lot of coaches, that flexibility is crucial. Many Clippers fans became frustrated with Dunleavy’s reliance on Cuttino Mobley for big minutes in recent years. What was often missed is that Mobley could guard athletic 3s, something Dunleavy desperately needed against more complicated offenses. Whatever shortcomings Mobley demonstrated — and there were many — the ability to stick him on a Carmelo Anthony or Paul Pierce was helpful.
Since Eric is unquestionably the Clippers’ shooting guard of the future — and since height is one area where Eric won’t improve — the next question is this: Given Eric’s size limitation, what do the Clippers need out of their small forward?
When you look at the rest of the personnel: Baron Davis, Zach Randolph, Chris Kaman/Marcus Camby, I think it’s fair to say that the most important attributes you want in a small forward are [1] Solid, if not lockdown, defensive skills against the league’s most dangerous small forwards, because Eric — for all his wonderful qualities as a shooting guard — can’t pick up those assignments. [2] An ability to keep the ball moving in the halfcourt.
If Al Thornton isn’t the long-term answer for the Clippers at the starting small forward spot, then neither is Mardy Collins. He’s far too ineffective an offensive player, even taking into account his redeeming qualities. The Clippers won last night because Collins did steady defensive work on a dynamic player, not because of his offensive output, which was a neutral contributing factor to the victory at best. The fact that Collins isn’t all that much worse than Thornton says a lot more about Al than it does about Mardy.
Barring another catastrophic injury, it’s widely assumed that the Clippers will deal one of their big men between now and the next trading deadline. When thinking about what the Clips might want in return, a well-conceived idea of how they can improve on the wings will be very helpful.