Detroit 98, Clippers 80
Posted by Kevin Arnovitz on Mon, 03/12/07, 09:42am:
All season, we’ve been trying to figure out precisely what is responsible for the Clippers’ demise. Watching Detroit run its offense on Sunday crystallized it for me: The Clippers have nobody on the floor who can pass the ball. Think about the Pistons for a second – Billups, Hamilton, Prince, Wallace, Webber. With the exception of Hamilton, every single one of these guys has a preternatural ability to move the ball, and Hamilton is no slouch, it’s just that his function in the offense is to move off the ball. When the ball ends up in his hands, it’s generally the culmination of the possession.
The Clippers? With the exception of Livingston, there isn’t an average passer on the roster. Kaman and Maggette are absolutely incapable of delivering so much as an entry pass. Mobley and Ross can’t even run a break. Brand, because of his size, has trouble passing out of the post, or finding guys on the weak side. Cassell, Hart, and Ewing, for point guards, are below average. Thomas is probably the most adequate passer on the roster. Think about that reality for a second: Tim Thomas is the best passer on the Clippers’ active roster. When there’s nobody on the floor who can pass the ball, nobody who’s willing to move off the ball, and only one guy who can create off the dribble – and does so indiscriminately – you get a miserably stagnant offense, and rigor mortis sets in.
The Clippers? With the exception of Livingston, there isn’t an average passer on the roster. Kaman and Maggette are absolutely incapable of delivering so much as an entry pass. Mobley and Ross can’t even run a break. Brand, because of his size, has trouble passing out of the post, or finding guys on the weak side. Cassell, Hart, and Ewing, for point guards, are below average. Thomas is probably the most adequate passer on the roster. Think about that reality for a second: Tim Thomas is the best passer on the Clippers’ active roster. When there’s nobody on the floor who can pass the ball, nobody who’s willing to move off the ball, and only one guy who can create off the dribble – and does so indiscriminately – you get a miserably stagnant offense, and rigor mortis sets in.







John R. wrote:
1. Entry pass to Kaman in a spot he likes = GREAT. 1 on 1 versus Webber he owns him and was owning him.
2. Double (sometimes triple) team comes and Kaman was picking up his dribble and protecting the ball = GREAT. This is actually development. In the past he would turn it over here by keeping his dribble.
3. All 4 other Clippers stand around = Sad.
Kaman drawing triple teams would seem to be a win in the long-term. And he really isn't an awful passer, he just needs someone to pass it to. He probably won't ever be jump-turn-and-precision-heave-cross-court guy, he just needs a cutter to come to the ball and he will find him.
No cutters leads to low percentage cross-court passes. He is definitely bad enough of a passer to miss those a few feet to the side. A teammate really still could come up with it, if they really wanted to.
Its a difference in fundamentals. Does playing to space exist to you? To Dallas, Phoenix, San Antonio and Detroit, the answer is yes. They run to space, they can pass to space, and because their team can do it they know how to defend it.
That's a tall mountain to climb if you can't.